To Satirize or Not to Satirize: That is the Question
By: Hava Rubin
Literature and Journalism -- Harvey Mudd
WRITER BIO:
A Jewish college student with a gift for satire, she crafts thought-provoking pieces that highlight the absurdities of modern life. Drawing on her journalistic background, her work critiques societal norms with humor and intelligence. Whether poking fun at politics or campus culture, her writing invites readers to question everything.
If history repeats itself, satire is the “I told you so.”
-- Alan Nafzger
Breaking Fake News: A Satirist's Guide to Deliberate Misinformation
Introduction
The phrase "breaking fake news" has taken on a whole new meaning in satirical journalism. Here, deliberate misinformation is a craft honed to expose the flaws of conventional reporting.
Strategy
A satirist starts with a kernel of truth-a real event or policy-and then twists it into an outlandish narrative. For example, an article might claim that a world leader has declared every Tuesday a national "Nap Day" to boost productivity, citing absurd statistics and a faux expert opinion from "Dr. Snooze, leader in sleep studies."
Execution
The art lies in the details. Create fake data that feels plausible enough to be questioned, and include quotes that mimic the cadence of serious journalism. The resulting narrative is both humorous and reflective of society's quirks.
Conclusion
Deliberate misinformation in satire is not about deceiving the audience; it's about using humor to highlight the absurdity of our media and political systems. It's a playful rebellion against the norms of fact-based reporting, inviting readers to laugh while they learn.
Not All Error Is Folly: A Guide to Writing Satirical Journalism
Satirical journalism is not about simply being inaccurate-it's about using deliberate errors as a lens to reveal deeper truths. In this guide, the mantra "not all error is folly" reminds us that every absurd exaggeration is a calculated step toward exposing reality's contradictions. Begin with a genuine issue-a government policy, corporate blunder, or public figure's questionable statement-and then push its details to the extreme. This twist transforms factual shortcomings into a playful commentary.
For example, imagine a story claiming that a new law requires all public speeches to be delivered in Shakespearean verse. The error isn't a failure; it's a strategic exaggeration that spotlights bureaucratic absurdity. Use invented statistics ("87% of citizens reportedly applaud the new 'bardic' mandate") and fabricate expert quotes from figures like "Professor Quill, Ph.D. in Absurd Policy Studies." Such techniques blur the lines between truth and exaggeration, compelling readers to laugh while rethinking conventional narratives.
By embracing intentional error, satirical journalism transforms the mundane into a witty critique of modern society. Here, each "mistake" is an invitation for critical reflection-a reminder that sometimes, the best commentary comes wrapped in the cloak of absurdity.
===============
Tone in Satirical Journalism
Tone sets satirical news apart. It's dry, not goofy: "Aliens invade; demand tax forms." Too silly-"LOL, aliens!"-and it's a cartoon. Too grim, and it's just sad. "IRS welcomes new filers" mocks bureaucracy straight-faced. Tone reflects real news-serious delivery, absurd content: "Probes delayed by paperwork." It's the contrast that sells it. Start normal: "Visitors arrive," then pivot: "Roswell rents soar." Practice balancing-dry keeps it sharp; wet flops. Try it: write a straight lead (new law), then skew dry ("fines for blinking"). Escalate: "Aliens sue for citizenship." Tone in satirical news is your tightrope-walk it steady, and the humor sticks.
==================
1. The Scientific Approach: The Nobel Prize for Error
Scientists at the prestigious Institute for Applied Satire have confirmed that not all mistakes are created equal. While most errors lead to unpaid parking tickets and regrettable text messages, some serve a higher purpose-like proving that you should never let a billionaire launch themselves into space without a return plan.
"Throughout history, mistakes have driven progress," said Dr. Harold Bungler, who famously miscalculated his mortgage rate and accidentally bought two houses. "Penicillin was discovered by mistake, and so was the McRib. One saved lives, the other… well, people seem to like it."
Satirical journalism operates on this very principle. When The Onion reported in 2015 that North Korea had landed a man on the sun, it wasn't just a joke-it was a reflection of the absurdity of state propaganda. In other words, the mistake was the point.
2. The Legal Perspective: The Case for Strategic Inaccuracy
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld that "Not all error is folly"-but only when it serves the comedic greater good.
"Satire enjoys the unique privilege of being wrong on purpose," stated Justice Clarence Redherring. "In contrast, Congress is wrong by accident. There is a difference."
Legal scholars point to landmark satirical cases, such as The Borowitz Report vs. Readers Expecting Real News, where a New Yorker satire piece about Congress being replaced by kindergarteners was initially believed by half the country. The argument? The fake news was so close to reality that it was functionally correct.
3. The Self-Help Version: How to Fail Your Way to Satirical Success
Tired of making mistakes? Don't be! The key to success in satirical journalism-and life-is failing strategically.
Step 1: Make the Mistake Look IntentionalIf your article says President Biden accidentally signed a bill making Taco Tuesday a federal holiday, you could issue a correction… or you could argue it was satirical wishful thinking.
Step 2: Misquote an Expert for Dramatic EffectWhen questioned, always say your source is "a leading authority." If pressed for names, throw out "Harvard researchers"-no one ever follows up.
Step 3: Never Let the Truth Get in the Way of a Good PunchlineReal-life example: The Babylon Bee once reported that California was banning gasoline-powered lawnmowers because they were "too masculine." It was satire-but it also felt true enough to make people question reality. That's the sweet spot.
4. The Clickbait Version: You Won't Believe What This Journalist Got Wrong (On Satire Ethics Debate Purpose!)
We all make mistakes. But what if I told you that some of those mistakes could make you richer, funnier, and more beloved on the internet?
- Albert Einstein? Once flunked an exam.
- Oprah? Fired from her first job.
- The guy who invented Hot Pockets? Definitely not aiming for greatness.
Satirical journalists have turned this into an art form. The next time you see an article claiming that Congress is officially rebranding as a reality show, remember: the "error" is what makes it brilliant.
5. The Political Commentary: Mistakes vs. Spin
Satire operates on intentional mistakes. Politicians operate on unintentional ones. The key difference? Satirists admit when they're wrong.
When The Onion once joked that "Congress Opens New Fast-Food Lobby With a McDonald's in Senate Chamber", it was obviously satire. But when an actual Congressman suggested that wind turbines cause cancer, we had to pause and ask: wait, is this real?
"Satirical errors force people to think critically," says Dr. Linda Factcheck, an expert in modern misinformation. "Political errors… not so much."
6. The Historical Approach: The Great Mistakes That Changed the World
Did you know that Columbus wasn't trying to discover America? He was lost. That's right-one of the biggest historical events was just a glorified wrong turn.
Satire works the same way. When Jonathan Swift wrote A Modest Proposal, suggesting that the Irish eat their children to solve poverty, it was an intentional mistake in logic. The satire was so good that some people actually thought he was serious.
That's the power of error: it makes you stop and think.
7. The Tech Industry Take: Satire as a Glitch in the Matrix
In Silicon Valley, "move fast and break things" is a business model. In satirical journalism, "write fast and break expectations" is the strategy.
Take ChatGPT-yes, even AI gets things wrong sometimes. But when a satirical article claims that a new app lets billionaires pay to control regular people like video game avatars, is that really an error… or just an early product leak?
Tech and satire share one thing in common: sometimes, a wild claim today is just reality waiting to Exposing Reality Satire happen.
8. The Social Media Rant: Why Mistakes Make You Smarter (Or At Least More Entertaining)
If you've ever sent a text to the wrong person or confidently said "good afternoon" at 9 a.m., congratulations-you've experienced the beauty of the productive mistake.
Satirical journalism operates in the same realm. Fake news is dangerous when it tries to deceive. But satirical news? That's where the fun begins.
A great satirical mistake forces the audience to think: "Wait… is this real?" If they have to Google it, the joke worked.
9. The Economics Version: Why Satirical Errors Are an Investment in Truth
A mistake is a liability-unless you turn it into profit.
- Newspapers issue corrections.
- Satirists issue better versions of reality.
When The Onion reported that billionaires were hoarding the moon's resources for themselves, it wasn't true-yet. But as space tourism ramps up, satire starts looking more like early market analysis.
10. The Sports Analogy: The Michael Jordan of Satirical Errors
Michael Political Satire Tips Jordan once said, "I've missed more than 9,000 shots in my career… and that's why I succeed."
Satirical journalists miss on purpose, because missing the point is the whole point.
When a satirical outlet claims that FIFA is considering holographic referees to prevent bribery, it's not true-but it feels true enough that you start to wonder.
And that's why error in satire isn't failure. It's the assist.
Each version takes the core idea-"Not all error is Deliberate Misinformation Guide folly"-and explores it through different lenses, using satire, humor, and cultural commentary. Which one's your favorite?
===============
How to Write Satirical Journalism: "Not All Error Is Folly"
Satirical journalism isn't about getting things wrong-it's about getting them so wrong they become right. A great satirical article walks the fine line between absurdity and reality, exposing truths in a way that traditional news never could. It's the only form of journalism where making deliberate mistakes isn't a failure-it's a strategy.
The phrase "Not all error is folly" sums it up perfectly. In satire, errors aren't just acceptable; they're essential. A well-placed exaggeration, misquote, or logical fallacy can highlight hypocrisy better than a hundred investigative reports.
If you've ever wanted to master the art of satirical journalism-whether for comedy, political commentary, or simply to mess with people on the internet-this guide will teach you how to make the right kind of mistakes.
Why Being Wrong is the Best Way to Be Right
Traditional journalism values accuracy. Satirical journalism values strategic inaccuracy. The goal isn't to mislead but to use exaggeration, irony, and absurdity to highlight the ridiculousness of reality.
Think of it like this:
- Traditional news: "Congress debates bill to regulate social media algorithms."
- Satire: "Congress Debates Social Media Regulation, Spends 3 Hours Asking If TikTok Can Read Their Minds."
See the difference? The satire isn't technically "correct," but it feels true-because deep down, we know some lawmakers really don't understand the technology they regulate.
The key to great satire is making sure the error in your writing serves a purpose. A bad mistake misleads. A great mistake makes people think.
The Different Types of "Errors" in Satirical Journalism
1. The Outrageous Exaggeration (Turning the Truth Up to 11)
One of the most effective satirical techniques is to take a real issue and push it to a ridiculous extreme.
Example:
- Reality: CEOs make record profits while cutting wages.
- Satire: "Billionaire CEO Announces Layoffs to Celebrate 'Record Year for Company Profits.'"
Why it works: The statement is absurd, but it's also… kind of believable? Satire works best when readers have to pause and wonder if it might actually be true.
2. The Fake Expert (Giving Authority to the Wrong People)
A great way to create satire is to give a platform to someone who has no business commenting on the topic at hand.
Example:
- Reality: Lawmakers hold a hearing on climate change.
- Satire: "Congress Calls Fast-Food Executive as Climate Expert; Cites His Extensive Experience Reheating the Planet."
Why it works: It mocks the real tendency of politicians to consult whoever they feel like, no matter how unqualified.
3. The Absurd Statistic (Numbers That Sound Official but Are Totally Made Up)
People love statistics. So why not create some that sound both ridiculous and plausible?
Example:
- Reality: Tech CEOs donate to both political parties.
- Satire: "Study Finds 92% of Billionaires Donate to Both Political Parties to Ensure They Always Win."
Why it works: There's no actual study-but doesn't it feel like there should be?
4. The Unexpected Analogy (Comparing Things That Should Never Be Compared)
A well-placed false analogy can turn a satirical article into comedy gold.
Example:
- Reality: The government introduces a new tax on online transactions.
- Satire: "Government to Tax Online Shopping, Calls It 'The Digital Equivalent of Toll Booths, But Without the Scenic View.'"
Why it works: It turns a dry policy into a joke by likening it to something just familiar enough to make people laugh.
How to Structure a Satirical News Article
Step 1: Write a Headline That Feels Real and Fake at the Same Time
Your headline should make people pause and think, "Wait… is this real?"
Formula:? [Shocking Claim] + [Unexpected Twist] = Perfect Satirical Headline
Examples:
- "Scientists Discover That Billionaires Age Slower; Attribute It to Never Experiencing Stress."
- "Congress to Start All Meetings with Group Nap to Increase Productivity."
Step 2: Set the Trap in the First Sentence
Your opening should feel like a real news article-right up until it veers off a cliff into absurdity.
Example:"In a move that financial experts describe as both groundbreaking and incredibly predictable, Congress has announced a new plan to tax Americans based on how much they complain about taxes on social media."
It starts with "a move that financial experts describe as groundbreaking", which sounds real… then ends with "taxing complaints on social media," which is pure satire.
Step 3: Use a Fake Expert for Maximum Credibility
A great satirical piece needs an expert quote that sounds officially ridiculous.
Example:"According to Dr. Larry Profiteer, an economist who has never worked a real job, 'This tax will ensure that only the wealthiest Americans can afford to be angry on the internet.'"
Adding an expert with a suspiciously ironic name Strategic Inaccuracy Art (Dr. Profiteer) makes the satire even stronger.
Step 4: Throw in a Fake Statistic for Extra Legitimacy
A well-crafted fake statistic makes an article feel almost too real.
Example:"A new study finds that 73% of lawmakers believe 'Venmo' is the name of a foreign dictator, further complicating discussions on digital finance regulation."
It's obviously fake, but also… terrifyingly plausible.
Step 5: End with an Even Bigger Absurdity
Your last sentence should leave the reader laughing-or deeply unsettled.
Example:"To address public concern, Congress has promised to conduct further research by watching YouTube explainer videos and asking their grandchildren how to use 'the apps.'"
It's the perfect punchline because it highlights something very real-the fact that some lawmakers truly don't understand the things they regulate.
How to Avoid Bad Satire (Common Mistakes That Are Folly)
Being Too Obvious
- If your joke is too exaggerated, it won't work.
- Example: "Aliens Seize Control of the White House" ? Too absurd.
- Better: "New President Proves He's Human by Failing CAPTCHA Test During Inauguration Speech."
Being Too Real
- If your joke is too close to reality, people might mistake it for actual news.
- Example: "Senator Takes Bribe, Says It's a 'Donation.'"
- This